US President Donald Trump Again Hints at Using Force to Seize Greenland

US President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated controversial remarks suggesting the United States might assert control over Greenland, brushing aside Denmark’s sovereignty over the autonomous Arctic territory and insisting action is imminent—even if it means doing it “the hard way.”

Speaking at the White House during an event with energy executives, Trump stressed that Greenland’s strategic value in the face of increasing Russian and Chinese military activity makes it vital for US national security. “We’re going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not,” he said, adding that he would prefer a diplomatic deal but was prepared to act forcefully if necessary.

Trump framed his comments as part of broader geopolitical competition, claiming that without US control, rival powers could gain influence in the Arctic—a region of growing strategic importance.

His remarks mark a notable escalation in rhetoric about the remote, mineral-rich island, which is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and enjoys a high degree of autonomy. Greenland already hosts a significant US military presence, but Denmark retains responsibility for its defense and foreign affairs.

European leaders, including Denmark’s allies, have strongly rejected any suggestion of forced US takeover, affirming Greenland’s sovereignty and warning that military action would have serious consequences for NATO and international law. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni ruled out support for any US military move on Greenland while urging enhanced allied cooperation in the Arctic.

The White House has said that using the US military remains “an option,” though major Republican lawmakers have sought to downplay the likelihood of actual force being used. Diplomatic engagements are underway, with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio scheduled to meet with Danish and Greenlandic officials next week to discuss the issue.

Trump’s renewed focus on Greenland comes amid wider debates over Arctic security, resource competition, and the role of alliances in countering strategic rivals such as Russia and China.