‘Kaun Baithayega?’ Rajnath Singh Loses Cool at Opposition During Vande Mataram Debate in Lok Sabha

16

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh lost his temper on Monday during a heated debate in the Lok Sabha marking 150 years of ‘Vande Mataram’. Tensions spiked when some Opposition MPs repeatedly interrupted his speech, asking him to “sit down”.

Visibly angered, Singh shot back:

“Kaun baithanewala hai? Kaun baithayega? Kya baat kar rahe ho… baith! Yeh himmat hogayi?”
(“Who will make me sit? Who can make me sit? What are you even saying? Sit! How dare you?”)

His sharp remarks triggered loud protests from the Opposition benches, while several BJP MPs rose in support of the Defence Minister, accusing the Opposition of disrespect.

Singh then appealed to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to intervene, prompting the Speaker to signal the Opposition to calm down.


What Rajnath Singh Said on ‘Vande Mataram’

In his speech, Rajnath Singh launched a strong attack on the Congress, accusing it of “fragmenting” the national song due to what he called “appeasement politics” initiated during the era of former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.

“Restoring the glory of Vande Mataram is the need of the hour… Justice that should have been done to Vande Mataram did not happen. Unequal treatment was given to the national anthem and the national song.”

He argued that the sidelining of ‘Vande Mataram’ was part of a broader trend of appeasement and amounted to an injustice “not just to a song but to the people of independent India”.

Singh stressed the need for an “unbiased evaluation” of the song and clarified that neither Vande Mataram nor its source text, Anand Math, was anti-Islam. Instead, he said, the work represented popular resistance against the Nawab of Bengal and British rule.

“Most parts of the original version have been forgotten… Those stanzas depict the true essence of India.”

The fiery exchange added intensity to the ongoing Winter Session, which has seen strong positions emerge over cultural issues, historical narratives and national identity.

Comments are closed.